Sue sent me a batch of pictures taken by astronaut Sunita Williams. You can find more here and information about her mission here . Things look a lot more peaceful from a distance.
Various & Sundry for Friends & Family
"Each new heinous act will prompt government appeals for greater surveillance powers......in the ensuing dread and panic, a frightened public will grant those new powers." David Brin, The Transparent Society © 1998
"I worry about this participatory panoptikon more than I do private detectives or government spooks...What's happening is that everybody is now a tiny piece of one colossal Big Brother." Bruce Sterling quoted by Suzanne Stefanac
Almost everyone I know is tired of one-sided privacy. An example would be dealing with local government. (S.F.) After presenting various identification strings to prove your bona fides, you're refused a name in return. (policy) Climbing the inevitable ladder becomes more difficult without an initial rung. Your official records seem to be available to any government employee, of any ilk, but getting a copy for yourself, oy³! Yes, there are firewalls in place, guidelines du jour, and sunshine laws-o-rama, but without a lawyer at hand, access is only for the infinitely patient.
On a larger scale, cyberspace itself is privacy's death of a thousand cuts. I'm sure Obama's new computer security initiative will include autonomous editing bots, but I doubt they'll be available off the shelf at Office Depot. The best I can currently offer is: 1) Think first, then call, than think some more, then post. I do pay a monthly fee to keep this Verizon e-leash on my belt. 2) Push for some two-way transparency in government. If their so darn busy protecting my interests, give me a name and address so I can thank them. After all, they know where I live.
I note the resurgence of a sales tool that's been around forever. Sometimes labeled epideictic rhetoric, sometimes disconnected logic, it's a favorite of political pitchmen of all stripes. I'll use the debate about teaching methods as an example.
The first premise is that all individuals learn differently. This is almost self evident. I have no trouble with manipulating strings of numbers, but spelling words correctly , no. ( thank-you spellchecker, thank-you dictionaries) The second premise is that ( insert group here) has to be taught in such and such a way due to shared characteristics. The disconnect is the movement of the specific to the general without logical cause. Moving from handwaving to more specific examples:
Since Retired Catholic Archbishop Rembert G Weakland has been accused of a cover-up, all the ecclesial hierarchy are engaged in a cover-up.
Since Rush Limbaugh is a goombah, anyone calling themselves a conservative must be a *%$#**......and so on. Moving from a single example to a disconnected general conclusion is the kind of lead-'em-by-the-nose thinking that PR. people love. Muttering about a counter example just proofing the rule ain't worth jolly-Jack. Lazy thinking is lazy thinking, and just because it's easy or common doesn't give it any added value.
This is a first try. The code for embeding documents is a bit cranky. ( no, operator error isn't a possibility, I checked it myself ) A toggle in the right hand side of the frame will give you a full page view. http://scribd.com/Music Theory - Advanced